Enrichment is related to models of curriculum acceleration or compaction. None of these is characterised as approaches to the curriculum of enrichment. Acceleration implies that students are previously granted access to “regular curriculum material” and are encouraged to move faster through relevant content , typically leading to early entry into globally known exams.
Curriculum compaction more generally rearranges a curriculum in a way that allows participants to “more effectively” cover aspects of the standard curriculum. This is also done by dynamically clustering similar course themes.
Enrichment is not concerned with acceleration or compaction, but what happens in the period generated by those methods and “doing more of the same” is not enrichment.
Do’s of math enrichment curriculum
- The time generated is often used for activities involving problem solving and/or extension of the math enrichment program curriculum.
Here, though, the enrichment model is still regarded as an add-on. This eliminates access to learning opportunities for the majority of students and introduces critical organisational constraints within the classroom.
- If it is worth doing problem solving and mathematical thinking connected to engaging mathematical contexts, undoubtedly it is worth doing a large portion of time for everybody. The curriculum as a whole should be invaded by enrichment and not merely open to those who work the best.
- Although conventional teaching typically focuses on algorithm memorization and implementation. In an engaging atmosphere full of fun games, storeys and puzzles, the Math Enrichment Curriculum helps students develop advanced problem-solving skills.
- Techniques for visualisation allow students grasp advanced concepts that are typically brushed over in typical and even gifted math classes in school about numbers, sets, relations and functions.
Although the five levels of Math Enrichment differ in complexity, all of them share the following:
- Sports, storeys and puzzles that are meticulously designed;
- Focus on critical thought, analytical reasoning, mental arithmetic, and scientific instrument understanding; and
- The use of visual and physical instruments in innovative ways to teach advanced concepts.
Don’ts of math enrichment Programs
Engaging issues which:
- Establish problem solving techniques and use them,
- Promoting mathematical reasoning.
A technique for teaching that encourages:
- Act in party,
- Communicating mathematically,
- Valuing and using differentiation as a teaching method,
- Recognizing that mathematics is always difficult.
Enrichment is not just knowing facts and displaying talents. Mathematical skills and awareness may be a guide to an enrichment programme (needs-driven learning) as well as its effects.
Giving more of the same task
Job for enrichment should never feel like more work. Giving another worksheet drilling the same idea to advanced students would just motivate them to keep their head down next time they finish early.
- Setting unnecessarily demanding roles
- Enrichment requires more complicated tasks to come up with, but this does not mean:
- Dealing with unknown proposals that have not been officially launched
- Students can’t finish purposefully producing tasks
- Providing students operate from a higher-grade level automatically.
When these measures succeed, there might be occasions, but they should never be the first option. Remember, enrichment is about furthering students – not testing them.